Reading Classic Recipes

Reading Classic Recipes

There's something magical about cracking open a cocktail book from the 1930s and seeing drinks that sound utterly alien to modern tastes. "Take a wine glass of Old Tom gin, a pony of gum syrup, the juice of half a lemon, and a dash of orange flower water." What the hell is a pony? Why is there glue in my drink? And who decided a wine glass was a unit of measurement?

Classic cocktail recipes are written in a language that feels familiar but isn't quite. It's like reading Shakespeare—you recognize most of the words, but the meaning keeps slipping sideways. The truth is, bartending books from the golden age of cocktails weren't written for home enthusiasts flipping through them on a lazy Sunday. They were written by bartenders, for bartenders, in an era when everyone in the profession understood the unspoken rules, the assumed knowledge, and the equipment that sat behind every bar in America.

Learning to decode these recipes isn't just about making old drinks taste good again. It's about understanding how cocktails evolved, why certain combinations worked, and how you can adapt centuries-old wisdom to the bottles sitting in your cabinet right now. Plus, there's genuine satisfaction in resurrecting a forgotten drink and watching your friends' faces when you tell them they're drinking something that was popular during Prohibition.

Quick Start: The Translation Guide

If you just want to dive into an old recipe book tonight, here's what you need to know:

Common measurements translated:

Ingredients that aren't what you think:

Quick adaptation rule: If an old recipe tastes too sweet, it probably is. Cut the sugar by 25-30% and adjust from there.

Essential technique adjustment: Old recipes often call for shaking everything. Modern practice: shake with citrus, stir without.

Now, let's get into the real stuff.

Why Old Recipes Read Like Hieroglyphics

When Jerry Thomas published "The Bon Vivant's Companion" in 1862, he wasn't writing for curious home bartenders. There was no such thing. He was documenting the working knowledge of professional bartenders, and he assumed anyone reading his book would already know the fundamentals. It's like a chef writing "sauté the mirepoix"—if you know, you know. If you don't, you're about to make a very confused phone call.

This creates three main challenges when working with classic recipes:

The measurement problem: Before standardization, measurements were whatever was at hand. A "wine glass" might be 2 ounces at one bar and 2.5 at another. A "pony" was generally understood to be about an ounce, but that was more guideline than rule. Some bartenders measured by count-pouring. Others eyeballed everything. The best historic recipes include ratios rather than absolute measurements because ratios scale and adapt.

The ingredient problem: Spirits were different. Gin in 1880 wasn't London Dry as we know it—it was often Old Tom, a slightly sweeter style that could handle more aggressive mixing. Whiskey was rougher, more variable in quality. Vermouth was fresher because it didn't sit on store shelves for months. Even citrus was different—lemons were smaller, more acidic, more varied. When you're working with a recipe that's 100 years old, you're trying to reverse-engineer a dish with fundamentally different ingredients.

The technique problem: Classic recipes were minimalist on technique because technique was assumed. When a recipe says "shake," it doesn't tell you how long, with how much ice, or how vigorously. Old bartenders knew. They'd learned by apprenticeship. You're learning from a book that's having half a conversation with you.

The Art of Measurement Archeology

The first step in decoding any classic recipe is translating the measurements into something your jigger can actually measure. Here's your Rosetta Stone:

Standard classic measurements:

The ratio revelation: The smartest way to approach old recipes is to ignore the specific measurements and look for ratios. If a recipe calls for a wine glass of gin, a pony of lemon, and a barspoon of sugar, you're looking at a 2:1:1/6 ratio (roughly). That ratio is what matters. You can scale it to 2 oz:1 oz:1/3 oz and you're in the ballpark. This is how professional bartenders work today—they think in ratios because ratios are portable and scalable.

Ingredient Metamorphosis

The spirits sitting in your home bar are related to, but not the same as, what was poured in 1890. Understanding these changes helps you adapt recipes intelligently rather than just following instructions and wondering why your drink tastes wrong.

Gin's identity crisis: The dominant gin in 19th-century cocktails was Old Tom—a slightly sweetened style that bridged the gap between genever (the malted, botanical precursor to gin) and the bone-dry London Dry we know today. Old Tom could handle the rough treatment cocktails dished out. If a pre-1920s recipe calls for gin, especially in a drink with citrus, assume it meant Old Tom. You can approximate this by adding about 1/4 ounce of simple syrup to modern London Dry gin, or you can buy actual Old Tom gin, which has made a comeback.

Genever (or "Holland gin") is a different beast entirely—think of it as whiskey's botanical cousin. It's richer, maltier, less piney. When old recipes specify "Holland gin," they mean genever, and substituting regular gin will give you a completely different drink.

Vermouth's decline: This is the big one. Vermouth in the classic cocktail era was fresh, vibrant, and consumed relatively quickly. Today's vermouth sits in someone's bar cart for six months while it slowly oxidizes into musty sadness. If you're making a Martinez or a Manhattan from an 1880s recipe, understand that your vermouth is probably delivering less flavor and more oxidation than the original called for. Use fresh vermouth (opened within a month, stored in the fridge), or reduce the vermouth slightly and expect a different balance.

Sugar in all its forms: "Gum syrup" appears constantly in old recipes and confuses everyone. It's not made from tree gum. It's rich simple syrup (2:1 sugar to water) that traditionally had gum arabic added to give it body and a silky texture. For home purposes, rich simple syrup is close enough. You'll also see "rock candy syrup" (another name for rich simple), "plain syrup" (1:1 simple syrup), and occasionally "gomme syrup" (gum syrup by its French name).

Citrus adjustment: Lemons and limes were smaller and more acidic in the 19th century. Modern citrus has been bred for size and sweetness. If an old recipe seems too tart, you probably measured correctly—your lemons are just different. Conversely, if it seems too sweet, modern citrus might be less punchy than what the original bartender used.

Decoding Technique Between the Lines

Classic recipes are maddeningly vague about technique because technique was assumed knowledge. Here's how to read between the lines:

"Shake well": This usually appears with any drink containing citrus, cream, or eggs. Shake hard for 10-15 seconds until the shaker is painfully cold. The goal is dilution, chilling, and aeration. Old bartenders shook harder and longer than most modern home bartenders do.

"Stir well": Spirit-only drinks were stirred. This hasn't changed. When you see gin and vermouth or whiskey and bitters, stir it in a mixing glass with ice for 20-30 seconds.

"Fine ice" or "cracked ice": They meant small ice pieces, not the dense cubes we use today. Ice was harvested in blocks and chipped or cracked into irregular chunks. This meant faster dilution. If you're following an old recipe exactly, you might want to use smaller ice or shake/stir a bit longer to compensate for our larger, denser cubes.

"Strain into a fancy cocktail glass": Translation: use a coupe or martini glass. "Fancy" meant stemmed. If it said "strain into a small bar glass," that meant a rocks glass.

"Dash the cocktail with something": When a recipe says "dash the cocktail with Angostura," it often means to add bitters on top, not shake them in. This is a garnish technique that's been mostly lost.

The Sugar Problem: Why Everything Tastes Too Sweet

This is the most common complaint when making classic cocktails: they're cloyingly sweet by modern standards. There's a reason for this, and it's not that our great-grandparents had terrible taste.

First, spirits were rougher. Pre-Prohibition whiskey wasn't the smooth, carefully aged product we have now. It was harsher, more burn-y, and needed sugar to smooth it out. Bathtub gin during Prohibition was even worse—some of it was literally poisonous—so drinks were sweetened heavily to mask the taste.

Second, palates have changed. We consume less sugar in beverages than people did in 1900. Cocktails competed with heavily sweetened punches, liqueurs, and cordials. A drink that seemed balanced then reads as syrupy now.

The fix: When adapting an old recipe, reduce the sugar by 25-30% on your first attempt. If a recipe calls for a barspoon of sugar syrup, try 1/2 to 3/4 of a barspoon. If it calls for "gum syrup" (rich simple), try regular simple syrup instead, or use less gum syrup than specified. You can always add more sweetness, but you can't take it back.

Also consider the sugar source. Some old recipes use Curaçao or maraschino liqueur as both flavor and sweetener. These are less sweet than simple syrup, so when you substitute, account for that.

Adapting Proportions: The Structured Approach

Here's a systematic method for bringing an old recipe into your modern bar:

Step one: Translate and ratio-fy. Convert all measurements to ounces and write down the ratio. "Wine glass of whiskey, pony of Italian vermouth, dash of bitters" becomes 2 oz:1 oz:1 dash, or a 2:1 ratio with bitters.

Step two: Make it as written (with measurement translation). Don't skip this. You need to taste what the original bartender was going for, even if it's not to your taste. Use proper technique—don't half-ass the shake or stir.

Step three: Identify the problem. Too sweet? Too strong? Too weak? Not enough citrus punch? Be specific about what's off.

Step four: Adjust one variable at a time. If it's too sweet, reduce the sweetener by 1/4 oz and try again. If it's too boozy, add another 1/4 oz of the modifier (vermouth, liqueur, etc.). If citrus seems weak, add 1/4 oz more or consider that your lemons are less acidic than theirs were.

Step five: Write it down. The worst thing you can do is successfully adapt a recipe and then forget what you changed. Keep a notebook or use your phone. Future you will be grateful.

When to Leave History Alone

Not every old cocktail deserves resurrection. Some drinks died for good reasons. If you've made three attempts at adapting a recipe and it still tastes like sweetened turpentine, maybe that drink was the bartender equivalent of a dad joke—funny at the time, cringe-worthy now.

But when you find a forgotten gem and successfully adapt it, you're not just making a drink. You're having a conversation across time with someone who stood behind a bar a century ago, dealing with ice delivery and flickering gas lights and customers who wanted something cold and strong after a long day. They figured out something that worked. You've figured out how to make it work again.

That's the real magic of reading classic recipes. It's not about historical reenactment or cocktail cosplay. It's about understanding that the fundamentals of a good drink—balance, flavor, technique—haven't changed. Only the language has.

Pour one out for Jerry Thomas and his wine-glass measurements. Then pour yourself the improved version, with actual measurements and fresh vermouth. He'd approve.

On This Page